3 Advanced Fat Management Techniques in Upper Blepharoplasty For Natural Results
- Admin
- Jul 7
- 6 min read
Updated: Sep 8
Facial fat management has undergone a significant transformation, moving beyond simple fat removal to a more refined approach that balances volume preservation, repositioning, and redistribution. This article is based on the research conducted by Miotti G, Di Filippo J, Grando M, Salati C, Parodi PC, Spadea L, Gagliano C, Musa M, and Zeppieri M. in their study "Fat Management in Upper Blepharoplasty: Addition or Subtraction Blepharoplasties, How and When", published in the World Journal of Clinical Cases (2024). Their findings emphasize the importance of understanding how and when to apply different fat management techniques in upper blepharoplasty, ensuring optimal aesthetic and functional outcomes.
Traditional Fat Management Techniques
Historically, facial fat management relied on methods such as direct excision of fat pads, conservative liposuction, and volume augmentation through fat grafting. In the periorbital region, surgeons have traditionally performed orbital fat removal or transposition to address eye bags and hollowness. However, these approaches often failed to account for long-term facial volume dynamics, leading to outcomes that could appear either overly hollow or unnaturally full.
With aging, facial fat redistribution and loss become more evident, and traditional methods often did not consider the interplay between fat compartments and structural support. As a result, there was a growing need to refine fat management strategies to better balance volume retention, repositioning, and removal.
Why Traditional Techniques Need Adjustments
The traditional focus on fat removal was driven by the idea of eliminating "excess" fat to create a more youthful look. However, this approach often disregarded the natural fat compartments that give the face its youthful contours. As aesthetic preferences shifted toward a more natural and balanced approach, it became clear that over-aggressive fat removal led to complications such as facial hollowing and premature aging.
The Shift in Fat Management: Why It Matters
Modern aesthetic trends emphasize a more natural and youthful look, shifting away from overly aggressive fat removal to more refined, strategic fat repositioning and redistribution. Understanding deep and superficial fat compartments has led to more sophisticated approaches that prioritize maintaining facial harmony and longevity in results.
This shift is critical for achieving outcomes that align with patient expectations for natural aging rather than drastic transformations. Moreover, contemporary approaches integrate new insights into fat metabolism and vascular supply, leading to safer and more predictable results.
How Facial Fat Dynamics Have Changed
Facial fat is not just a volume issue; it plays a structural role in facial support. With aging, fat loss leads to a hollowing effect, while excess fat in certain areas can create an unnatural fullness. The new paradigm of fat management takes into account the need for long-term balance rather than quick fixes, focusing on both preserving and repositioning fat to maintain a natural contour.
3 New Approaches to Fat Management: Techniques and Execution
1. Selective Fat Repositioning
Rather than simply excising excess fat, surgeons can reposition orbital and malar fat to restore youthful contours. For example:
SOOF (Sub-Orbicularis Oculi Fat) Repositioning: Lifting and securing SOOF to its original position helps maintain cheek projection while reducing infraorbital hollowness.
Lacrimal Gland and Fat Repositioning: In Asian blepharoplasty, preserving and repositioning fat instead of removing it helps prevent postoperative hollowness.
When to Use: Selective fat repositioning is ideal for patients who have experienced fat loss due to aging, resulting in hollow or sunken areas around the eyes or cheeks. It is best suited for individuals looking to restore youthful volume without over-removal of fat.
Ideal Candidates:
Patients with noticeable fat herniation but significant periorbital volume loss.
Those seeking correction of deep tear troughs or infraorbital hollowness without excessive fat removal.
Individuals with adequate fat volume who need redistribution rather than subtraction.
How to Perform:
SOOF Repositioning: The SOOF can be accessed via a lower eyelid incision, where the fat is gently lifted and repositioned to restore youthful fullness to the cheeks and lower eyelid.
Lacrimal Gland and Fat Repositioning: In cases of tear trough deformities or hollowing, repositioning the lacrimal gland along with adjacent fat can improve contour and reduce the hollowed appearance without excessive fat excision.
2. Fat Redistribution for Contour Enhancement
While fat repositioning and fat redistribution are similar, they have distinct applications. Fat redistribution involves breaking down fat into smaller components and moving them to different areas to enhance contour. This is more akin to fat grafting techniques, where fat is harvested, purified, and injected into volume-deficient regions.
Key applications include:
Micro-autologous Fat Grafting: This technique involves harvesting small fat parcels and injecting them into deficient areas such as the tear trough, temples, or upper eyelid sulcus. It provides subtle volume enhancement while maintaining a natural appearance.
Structural Fat Grafting: This approach uses layered fat placement in different facial planes to ensure better survival rates and long-term volume retention. It is particularly effective in patients with significant volume loss due to aging or previous aggressive fat removal.
Blending Zones for a Seamless Transition: Redistribution techniques focus on creating smooth transitions between facial compartments, preventing harsh demarcation lines that can occur with traditional excisional techniques.
When to Use: Fat redistribution is beneficial for patients who exhibit significant facial volume loss, particularly in the periorbital or temporal regions. It’s often used when there’s a need to restore youthful contours in a subtle, natural way.
Ideal Candidates:
Patients with significant volume loss but insufficient herniated fat for repositioning.
Cases where additional augmentation is required to complement repositioned fat.
Patients undergoing multi-plane facial rejuvenation, where redistribution ensures a more uniform aesthetic.
How to Perform:
Micro-autologous Fat Grafting: Harvest small amounts of fat from the patient’s abdomen or thighs. The fat is processed into a micro-fat form, then strategically injected into areas requiring volume restoration, like the temples, tear troughs, or nasolabial folds.
Structural Fat Grafting: This involves layering fat into areas of need, while ensuring deep placement near the bone and superficial placement for soft tissue support.
3. Combination Therapies with Biostimulatory Agents
Emerging techniques combine fat repositioning with biostimulatory fillers (e.g., PLLA, CaHA) to promote collagen production, enhancing skin elasticity and longevity.
Fat Repositioning with Biostimulatory Fillers (PLLA, CaHA): These fillers stimulate collagen production, enhancing structural support and elasticity while complementing fat repositioning procedures.
RF and Ultrasound-Assisted Fat Remodeling: Non-invasive technologies like radiofrequency (RF) and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) help refine contours and enhance skin tightening post-fat repositioning or redistribution.
Growth Factor-Enhanced Fat Grafting: The addition of PRP (platelet-rich plasma) or stromal vascular fraction (SVF) to fat grafts improves vascularization, increasing fat graft survival and preventing resorption.
When to Use:This approach is particularly useful for patients who want to not only restore volume but also improve skin texture and elasticity. It’s ideal for older patients or those experiencing skin laxity due to collagen loss.
Ideal Candidates:
Patients with poor skin elasticity who need additional collagen stimulation.
Cases where traditional fat grafting may not provide long-term volume retention.
Individuals seeking both volumetric correction and skin texture improvement.
How to Perform:
Fat Repositioning with Biostimulatory Fillers: After repositioning fat to restore youthful contours, biostimulatory fillers can be injected into areas requiring further enhancement. PLLA or CaHA fillers promote collagen stimulation, enhancing the effects of fat repositioning over time.
Advantages of the Modern Approach
More Natural Results: By preserving and repositioning fat instead of removing it completely, facial aesthetics appear softer and more youthful.
Reduced Risk of Hollowing: Traditional fat removal often led to premature aging effects, whereas new techniques maintain volume strategically.
Improved Longevity: Integrating biostimulatory fillers and strategic fat grafting helps sustain volume over time.
Less Invasive Options: Many of these methods can be performed with minimal incisions, reducing downtime and improving patient recovery.
Conclusion
The evolution of fat management techniques reflects a deeper understanding of facial aging and patient preferences. By shifting from simple excision to strategic repositioning, redistribution, and augmentation, surgeons can achieve longer-lasting, natural-looking results. Embracing these modern approaches ensures better patient satisfaction and aligns with contemporary aesthetic goals.
Reference:
Miotti G, Di Filippo J, Grando M, Salati C, Parodi PC, Spadea L, Gagliano C, Musa M, Zeppieri M. Fat management in upper blepharoplasty: Addition or subtraction blepharoplasties, how and when. World J Clin Cases. 2024 Jun 6;12(16):2796-2802. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i16.2796. PMID: 38899282; PMCID: PMC11185332.
Learn techniques behind Upper & Lower Blepharoplasty
in our upcoming Mini Fellowship:
IFAAS Mini Fellowship (Observation)
Upper & Lower Upper Blepharoplasty
Aug 18-19, 2025 - Seoul, South Korea - [Register Now]
Oct 9, 2025 - Singapore General Hospital - [Register Now]
Oct 10, 2025 - Singapore General Hospital - [Register Now]
More Upcoming Global Events
Comments