top of page

Female Rejuvenation: Fractional Radiofrequency Versus Microneedling

In the phase of menopause, the dramatic decline in estrogen levels initiates a complex array of transformations in the skin, introducing noticeable shifts in texture and elasticity. Initially, a conspicuous surge in dryness is observed, succeeded by a discernible reduction in firmness and suppleness. These shifts are intricately linked to a decline in sebum production, collagen density, dermal thickness, and the integrity of elastin fibers.

Research suggests that within the initial five years post-menopause, the depletion of dermal collagen can escalate up to 30%, accompanied by an annual reduction of approximately 2.1%. Concurrently, skin thickness undergoes a yearly decrease of 1.1%. These alterations wield a significant impact on the aging process, influencing the overall aesthetic and health aspects of the skin.

Beyond the visible implications on the skin, the repercussions of menopausal transitions extend to the female genital region, encompassing issues like vaginal dryness, pruritus, dyspareunia, discomfort, burning sensations, dysuria, and an elevated susceptibility to genitourinary infections. Consequently, women experience a direct influence on their overall well-being and quality of life, with a notable emphasis on the intimate and sensitive nature of these changes, including an observable increase in the laxity of external genitalia.

Diverse therapeutic strategies have emerged to counteract or alleviate these menopause-related changes, spanning systemic and topical treatments, surgical interventions, and more recent non-invasive procedures targeting the enhancement of genital skin appearance. However, challenges such as the inherent risks and costs associated with surgical procedures, along with contraindications linked to hormone replacement therapy, underscore the imperative for innovative and non-invasive therapeutic alternatives.

Among the burgeoning treatment modalities are laser therapies, including fractional CO2 or erbium (Er: YAG), Radio Frequency (RF) devices, and microneedling. These cutting-edge technologies aim to optimize general skin and mucosal tropism by stimulating fibroblasts, fostering neocollagenesis, and initiating neoelastogenesis through micro-punctures, setting in motion an inflammatory process conducive to the generation of new cells.

Significantly, fractional radiofrequency has exhibited effectiveness in addressing various concerns related to female genitalia, spanning vulvar laxity and functionality, heightened vaginal lubrication, and an increased concentration of type III collagen. Furthermore, the reported advantages are coupled with a minimal incidence of mild adverse events, culminating in a high rate of swift and favorable outcomes.

However, while the evaluation of RF devices for genitourinary conditions often relies on subjective patient-reported outcomes, the scrutiny of pre- and post-treatment histological alterations remains a relatively unexplored territory. Therefore, in this blog, we will compare the Fractional Radiofrequency (FRF) and microneedling in vulvar tissue in female rejuvenation.

Understanding Fractional Radiofrequency (FRF)

Fractional Radiofrequency (FRF) stands out as an advanced cosmetic and dermatological procedure aimed at addressing the diverse skin issues associated with the aging process. This innovative treatment involves the application of a specialized device emitting radiofrequency waves, a form of electromagnetic energy, onto the skin. Notably, FRF employs a distinctive fractional technique, delivering radiofrequency energy in pixelated patterns. This creates microthermal zones within the treated tissue while leaving surrounding areas untouched, fostering a faster and more efficient healing process compared to conventional treatments.

Throughout the FRF procedure, the targeted tissue undergoes heating from the radiofrequency energy, prompting the generation of new collagen and elastin fibers. These proteins are pivotal for providing structural integrity, support, and elasticity to the skin. Consequently, as the skin heals, it undergoes a transformative process, manifesting increased firmness, smoothness, and a rejuvenated, more youthful appearance.

The applications of FRF extend to a spectrum of skin concerns, encompassing wrinkles, fine lines, skin laxity, scars (including acne scars), and textural irregularities. The precision afforded by the fractional approach ensures targeted treatment of specific areas, minimizing downtime and reducing the likelihood of complications. Typically administered in a series of sessions, each session contributes to gradual enhancements in the treated areas, culminating in optimal results. FRF also finds application in vulvar tissue rejuvenation, specifically addressing issues such as sagging and enhancing functionality within the female genital region. This non-invasive approach has gained favor due to its effectiveness in stimulating collagen and elastin production, coupled with the added benefit of minimizing the inconvenience associated with the recovery period.

Advantages of FRF:

FRF boasts numerous merits in the realm of cosmetic and dermatological treatments. Primarily, it serves as a potent catalyst for skin rejuvenation, eliciting the production of collagen and elastin, which translates to enhanced skin elasticity and texture. A distinguishing feature of FRF is its non-invasive nature, minimizing downtime and lowering the risk of complications compared to more invasive alternatives. This characteristic renders FRF an attractive choice for those seeking aesthetic enhancements without the commitments or potential drawbacks associated with surgical interventions.

Furthermore, FRF showcases versatility in addressing a spectrum of skin concerns, ranging from wrinkles and fine lines to skin laxity, scars, and texture irregularities. The fractional approach allows for precise targeting of specific areas, ensuring that only the treated tissue undergoes alteration. This not only minimizes the impact on surrounding areas but also expedites the healing process. The staged nature of FRF treatments contributes to its appeal, allowing for gradual improvements over multiple sessions and resulting in outcomes that appear natural.

FRF emerges as a promising solution for concerns such as sagging and the enhancement of functionality. Its non-invasive nature and effectiveness in stimulating collagen production position it as a noteworthy option for those seeking improvements in intimate and sensitive regions.

Drawbacks of FRF:

Despite its numerous benefits, FRF comes with certain considerations. Firstly, the results achieved through FRF are typically temporary, necessitating maintenance sessions to sustain improvements over time. This introduces an ongoing commitment, and the cumulative cost of multiple sessions may be a factor for individuals with budget constraints.

Skin sensitivity post-FRF is another element to consider, with some individuals experiencing temporary redness, swelling, or sensitivity in the treated area. Although these side effects are generally transient, they contribute to the overall experience of the procedure. FRF may not be universally suitable, as certain individuals with specific skin conditions, medical histories, or contraindications may not be ideal candidates. A comprehensive consultation with a healthcare professional is crucial to assess eligibility and potential risks.

The varied response to FRF is noteworthy, as individual outcomes can differ based on factors such as skin type, age, and overall health. While many individuals experience positive results, there is no one-size-fits-all guarantee, and expectations should align with individual characteristics and circumstances.

Lastly, while adverse effects are uncommon, they can include issues such as blistering, scarring, or changes in pigmentation. The rarity of such events underscores the importance of selecting a qualified and experienced practitioner to minimize potential risks.

Understanding Microneedling in Vulvar Tissue

The realm of cosmetic procedures has introduced an innovative solution tailored for the female genital area – vulvar microneedling. This procedure, meticulously designed to address both aesthetic and functional concerns, employs a specialized device equipped with ultra-fine needles. These needles create controlled micro-injuries within the vulvar skin, with the overarching goal of stimulating the body's natural healing processes. At the heart of vulvar microneedling lies the strategic induction of controlled micro-injuries, serving as a catalyst for the production of two vital proteins: collagen and elastin. These proteins, pivotal for skin structure, support, and elasticity, undergo a surge in production. This surge is intended to elevate the overall texture, tone, and firmness of the genital skin.

Vulvar microneedling emerges as a sought-after solution for a spectrum of concerns, encompassing aesthetic issues like laxity and wrinkling, alongside functional benefits such as the augmentation of vaginal lubrication. The procedure is positioned as a holistic approach to female genital rejuvenation, addressing both the cosmetic and functional dimensions. Individuals grappling with concerns stemming from aging, childbirth, or other factors impacting the appearance and functionality of the vulvar region find vulvar microneedling to be a compelling option. It stands as a pivotal component within the broader framework of female genital rejuvenation, offering nuanced solutions to diverse issues.

Despite the transformative potential of vulvar microneedling, the associated downtime is minimal. Temporary side effects such as redness, swelling, and mild irritation in the treated area are observed. The transient nature of these effects allows individuals to swiftly resume their regular activities within a few days, making the procedure suitable for those with bustling lifestyles.

Pros of Microneedling in Vulvar Tissue:

Embracing microneedling in vulvar tissue unveils a spectrum of benefits spanning both aesthetic and functional enhancements. At its core, this procedure orchestrates controlled micro-injuries, awakening collagen production and fostering a revitalized vulvar landscape characterized by enhanced texture, firmness, and elasticity. Beyond the realm of aesthetics, microneedling adeptly addresses concerns like laxity, wrinkles, and textural changes, offering a non-invasive avenue for comprehensive rejuvenation.

Functionally, the process extends its prowess to potentially elevate vaginal lubrication, contributing to an overall enhancement in intimate comfort. The non-invasive nature of microneedling ensures minimal downtime and a reduced risk profile, contrasting favorably with more invasive alternatives. Its adaptability allows it to target an array of vulvar concerns linked to aging, childbirth, or evolving skin conditions. Furthermore, effective pain management, typically facilitated by topical anesthetics, ensures patient comfort during the procedure.

Cons of Microneedling in Vulvar Tissue:

While the merits of microneedling shine brightly, its downsides must be considered. The ephemeral nature of the results necessitates periodic maintenance sessions, introducing a potential financial commitment over time. Temporary side effects, including redness, swelling, or brief irritation in the vulvar area post-microneedling, are conceivable. The suitability of microneedling varies, with certain individuals potentially ineligible due to specific skin conditions or medical histories. Individual responses exhibit variability, influenced by factors like skin type, age, and overall health. The prospect of multiple sessions, while contributing to gradual improvements, may pose an inconvenience for some individuals. Additionally, albeit rare, adverse effects like blistering, scarring, or pigmentation changes underscore the importance of selecting a qualified practitioner to minimize potential risks.

Past Research

In 2022, a study titled "Comparative Effects of Fractional Radiofrequency and Microneedling on the Menitalia of Postmenopausal Women: Histological and Clinical Changes" was conducted to evaluate the clinical and histological effects of Fractional Radiofrequency (FRF) and microneedling on vulvar tissue among postmenopausal women. A total of thirty participants were randomly assigned to either the FRF (G1) or microneedling (G2) groups. Sub-ablative FRF employed fractionated electrodes with an intensity of 8 mJ, while microneedling utilized a derma roller system. Evaluation encompassed the Vaginal Laxity Questionnaire (VLQ), EuroQol Five-Dimensional (EQ-5D) questionnaire, and the Blatt and Kupperman Menopausal Index (BKMI). Histological insights were obtained through pre- and post-treatment biopsies of the labia majora. Statistical analyses employed paired t-tests for intra-group comparisons and independent t-tests for intergroup assessments.

Results illuminated noteworthy changes in VLQ values post-treatment for both groups (p = 0.01 for G1, p = 0.001 for G2), with no significant intergroup distinctions (p > 0.05). Histological scrutiny unveiled FRF's effectiveness in enhancing fibroblasts, blood vessels, and mitigating fatty degeneration in comparison to the control (p < 0.05). Furthermore, immunohistochemical analysis indicated heightened expression of type III collagen and vimentin in both FRF and microneedling samples (p < 0.05).

In conclusion, this study establishes the efficacy of Fractional Radiofrequency (FRF) and microneedling in addressing flaccidity in the female external genitalia, accompanied by significant histological transformations, particularly in collagen remodeling. The observed positive changes not only highlight the aesthetic benefits but also suggest a potential reversal of age-related structural alterations in vulvar tissue for postmenopausal women. Beyond cosmetic improvements, these interventions offer a non-invasive or minimally invasive means to enhance overall well-being. The safety profile and high patient satisfaction further underscore the viability of FRF and microneedling as valuable tools in addressing the unique concerns of postmenopausal women. As the field of aesthetic gynecology advances, these findings contribute to the growing evidence supporting these modalities, prompting future research to delve into long-term outcomes, explore potential synergies, and elucidate broader implications for women's health.


A mini-review of aesthetic gynecology and leading gynecology associations’ approaches to this issue (2018)

Comparative effects of fractional radiofrequency and microneedling on the genitalia of postmenopausal women: Histological and clinical changes (2022)

Female genital cosmetic surgery: a review of techniques and outcomes (2013)

Nonsurgical vulvovaginal rejuvenation with radiofrequency and laser devices: A literature review and comprehensive update for aesthetic surgeons (2018)


Discover the A to Z Science behind Non-surgical Female Rejuvenation

in our upcoming Mini Fellowship:

IFAAS Mini Visiting Fellowship (Hands-On)

Non-surgical Female Rejuvenation: Injectables & Light Based Devices

Mar 22, 2024 - Seoul, South Korea - [Register Now]


More Upcoming Global Events


bottom of page